I hope that this idea will work and that we will all get something out of the book and each others comments and replies.
Right off the top, please be sure to read the introduction. It is very short, but also very poignant. The focus is not being the men we should be, despite our strong desire to be. Do not overlook this! This has been very meaningful to me, especially, over the last little while. To paraphrase Paul - I do what I don't want to do, and I don't do what I want to do. If you really let that sink in, it is a helpless condition - but one many of us share. On page 6, the quoted scripture at the end from the Message version kind of kidney punches me. It is so clear and highlights one of my own frustrations.
I would also like to point out Noland's distinguishing of 'do' and 'be' on the next page: "Do is an action which we start and stop, while be is a state we are in, or a reality, an "actuality". This is a great way to distinguish the difference between the two. It isn't a play on words - it is a way to make us more conscious of what state we are currently in - are we being, or doing when it comes to our spiritual walk?
In the first chapter, on page 14, Noland tell about a friend who names a condition "slot-machine faith" - a very appropriate name. I have had a few guys randomly email as tell me that they have screwed up their relationships with their children, and wanted to know how to get it back. I gave them advice on what I thought they had to do, and asked them to let me know how it turns out...they never email back. Did they forget? Not likely. Chances are they were unwilling to follow the difficult, humbling, self-sacrificing advice they received. They wanted a 'slot-machine' fix.
I don't want to steal anyone else's thunder, since I have the advantage of being the first to comment on this chapter, but there is one more nugget of wisdom I would like to point out: On page 17, Noland succinctly says, "We can only become great at what we apply." For example, I love hockey. I watch almost all of the Leaf games on TV and I have coached my son's teams for 10+ years. I understand the game very well. I didn't, however, as matter of finances, play the game (apart from road hockey) until I turned 30. Even then, it was only ever shinny. Despite all my knowledge of hockey, was I great at it? Absolutely not - because I didn't apply that knowledge enough to become great. I did apply that knowledge to baseball and considered making a career of it. Knowledge is not enough. We have to apply it!
I am eager to hear what you guys all thought of this chapter, and what stood out to you.
Stay REAL!